![]() ![]() Court of Appeals, 153 SCRA 420 De Lima v. Ruiz, 148 SCRA hence the need for this Court to broaden its inquiry in this case and decide the same on the merits rather than merely resolve the procedural question raised (Dorado v. Court of Appeals, (95 SCRA 621 cited in Ortigas & Co. In the case at bar dispensing with such procedural steps would not anyway affect substantially the merits of their respective claims as held in Velasco v. Court of Appeals, 122 SCRA 709 ) where there is enough basis to end the basic controversy between the parties here and now. In line with jurisprudence, such time consuming procedure may be properly dispensed with to resolve the issue (Quisumbing v. SUPREME COURT ISSUE MAY FINALLY BE RESOLVED INSTEAD OF REMANDING THE CASE TO A LOWER COURT WHERE THERE IS ENOUGH BASIS THERETO. People of the Philippines, 112 SCRA 573 ).Ħ. In a number of cases, this Court in the exercise of equity jurisdiction decided to disregard technicalities in order to resolve the case on its merits based on the evidence (St. In addition to the basic merits of the main case, such petition usually embodies justifying circumstances which warrant our heeding the petitioner’s cry for justice, inspite of the earlier negligence of counsel (Serrano v. Where strong considerations of substantial justice are manifest in the petition, this Court may relax the stringent application of technical rules in the exercise of equity jurisdiction. STRINGENT APPLICATION OF TECHNICAL RULES, RELAXED IN THE EXERCISE OF EQUITY JURISDICTION. A judgment of the Court of Appeals that become final by reason of the mistake of the herein petitioner’s lawyer may still be reviewed on appeal by the Supreme Court particularly where the Supreme Court already gave due course to the petition for review (Ernesto v. A FINAL JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF APPEALS MAY STILL BE REVIEWED BY THE SUPREME COURT. ![]() Procedural technicality should not prevail over substantive rights of a party to appeal (NEA v. SUBSTANTIVE RIGHTS OF PARTY PREVAIL OVER PROCEDURAL TECHNICALITY. Court of Appeals, 137 SCRA 570, 1985) It was further emphasized that we allowed the filing of an appeal in some cases where a stringent application of the rules would have denied it, or when to do so would serve the demands of substantial justice and in the exercise of our equity jurisdiction (Serrano v. The right to appeal should not be lightly disregarded by a stringent application of rules of procedure especially where the appeal is on its face meritorious and the interest of substantial justice would be served by permitting the appeal. Court of First Instance of Misamis Oriental, 121 SCRA 338 ).Ģ. Non-compliance with procedural requirements in taking its appeal cannot be deemed sufficient to deprive a party of a chance to secure a review by this court in order to obtain substantial justice more so where liberality accorded to the petitioner becomes compelling because of the ostensible merit of petitioner’s case (Olango v. REMEDIAL LAW CIVIL ACTIONS APPEAL NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS, NOT SUFFICIENT TO DEPRIVE A PARTY A CHANCE TO SECURE A REVIEW. Franco Restaino, Storia dei fumetti.1.Marmaduke (conosciuto in Italia come Sansone).Tra le strisce più significative attualmente pubblicate in Italia ricordiamo: Un altro grande successo dello United Feature è stato Garfield, di cui ha distribuito le strisce dal 1978 al 1993. Tuttavia il più grande successo del Syndacate sono stati i Peanuts, distribuiti dal 1950 al 2010, anno in cui i diritti di questa striscia sono stati ceduti. Il primo successo dello United Feature furono, nel 1929, i fumetti di Tarzan. Si occupa della distribuzione di 150 strisce a fumetti e colonne editoriali in America e nel mondo. Lo United Feature Syndicate (parte della United Media) è una grande azienda americana di syndication di strisce a fumetti e colonne editoriali, appartenente alla E.W. Segui i suggerimenti del progetto di riferimento. Contribuisci a migliorarla secondo le convenzioni di Wikipedia.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |